Photo management software that doesn’t suck?

Dear Lazyweb: I’m looking for something to manage my photos. For now, I use a hierarchy of folders to divide things up by date. QuickLook and Preview are my primary viewing tools. I only have a couple gigs, spanning maybe a hundred discrete events, so I’m not a very heavy user.

iPhoto uses 80% of my CPU at idle. Just sitting there, open. It only exports web galleries to .Mac, which is worthless to me. “Events” feels like a waste of code… they could have just autosplit albums on import and let albums optionally be strongly associated with dates. And I still don’t like how iPhoto hides all the image files in its bundle in the Pictures folder, making it nigh-impossible to find the files with any other tool. Verdict: Not interested.

Aperture 1.5 crashed on launch, repeatably. I’m hovering just above the minimum system requirements anyway. Shame, it looked decent. I haven’t ruled it out… but if it’s anything like Apple’s usual products it won’t run very well on my Powerbook5,4 anyway.

So what else is out there?

I used iView Media Pro a half-dozen years ago (yipes!). It was a bit clunky but it worked. Has anybody else used it more recently?

Bridge looks worthless to anyone who’s not heavily invested in Adobe products. Right out.

From what I saw, Lightroom looks more aimed at photo editing than organization—the opposite of iPhoto—which makes it a bit less suitable for me. It also looks heavy. But I’m still very interested in it. Does anyone around here have a copy I can fiddle with?

Not interested in Photoshop Elements; Save For Web isn’t quite enough to justify the endless you-must-be-an-admin-user style nightmares.

3 Responses to “Photo management software that doesn’t suck?”

  1. Boughter says:

    I’ve been (regrettably) just using iPhoto for a number of years. I may give out a little search for something better myself in the coming days, when term papers stop trying to kill me. Holler if you find a good solution before then.

  2. Rick Auricchio says:

    Lightroom and Aperture are oriented more toward whole-photo filtering, e.g. contrast/color/exposure stuff. PhotoShop is big on lassoing and editing of parts of the pic. Major difference there.

    There’s always SeaShore, which you’ve probably already tried.

    Pixelmator is really slick, but it seems oriented more toward funky filters, somewhat the opposite of the overall-adjustment done by Lightroom.

Leave a Reply


Or, enter your OpenID URL to log in: (cookies required)

Just another WordPress weblog